Sound Reduction


Download: Sound Reduction Numbers – How We Test

Sound Reduction Numbers – What do they mean?
At VocalBooth™ our priority is that you are as confident as we are about your VocalBooth purchase. We understand that comparing sound reduction numbers with competitive products can be confusing and misleading. It’s a frustration to us as well that there is not an industry standard for testing. We’ll illustrate how we do our testing. Bottom line—we do it differently. We believe the way we test our booths from a technical and practical approach is the most accurate available. We could get higher sound reduction numbers using other methods but we choose not to. At VocalBooth our goal is to provide you with an honest reading that makes sense verses one that just makes us look good on paper. We hope you feel the same.

The VocalBooth.com testing method for sound reduction numbers.

Step 1: By using two speakers 8′ apart we are creating a volume sound instead of directional sound. This best mimics typical room environments where sound is distributed in all directions. VocalBooth Sound Reduction Step 1
Step 2: Placing a booth around the
microphone will show the volume reduction of the distributed sound without changing the ratio of the initial sound to microphone measurement.
VocalBooth Sound Reduction Step 2


Below are of testing methods that can increase sound reduction numbers testing methods used by other companies to inflate numbers:

Bogus Testing Methods Used By Competitors   Bogus Testing Methods Used By Competitors
A. Placing the microphone right next to the speaker for the initial measurement gives a direction larger value.
B. Using a reflective small enclosed space to increase the
over all volume background will create a larger
measurement value.
  C. When the microphone outside of a booth is moved the environment is changed multiple ways.

i. The increase in distance between microphone and speaker creates an exponential reduction in sound volume.
ii. Sound exiting the booth is disbursed in multiple directions into a large cavernous room. This allows for the microphone to only pickup the directional measurements coming from the wall of the booth. So there is a triple loss here, dispersed sound coming through the walls, then the exponential reduction due to distance change, and that the escaping sound is
not being released into a large room.
Bogus Testing Methods Used By Competitors Bogus Testing Methods Used By Competitors
Some sound room manufacturers, especially for metal rooms, take only the STC value of parts of their booth. STC or sound transmission coefficient is an industry standard for testing parts of a product— not a full room measurement. This measurement is simply from a 2′ square section of their wall that was sent to a lab that checks the sound reduction going through the product. There are no allowances for how the booth is put together. Basically these tests do not account for sound penetration through the edges of the panel connections, around doors, or through ventilation setups. Again these tests best optimize the value received for the material used, but do not reflect how the product will be used. This testing method is subpar and has limited relevance. It does follow some standards and eliminates some sound reduction improvements, but does not take into effect poor design or manufacturing aspects for the end-user.